To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91158
User ab changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Assigned to|ab |hjs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 1 09:39:09 +0000
2008 -------
ab->rene: First, please calm down. There's no reason for getting personal.
You had to change your patch several times, even after you said it is tested.
So it was a good idea to let another expert have a look, wasn't it?
But anyway in your last comment you ask if this could be masterfixed. This
could make sense, but this then really should be done by hjs. I don't even
have the rights. So I will assign this issue back to him now and it surely
will speed up things if you don't assign it back to me this time.
ab->hjs: Do you think we should apply this patch as a masterfix? Otherwise
I will create a cws for it. We also have to take #i91232 into account. It
should be fixed in the same scope, but there's still a problem of getting
some files correctly zipped in the !Java version.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
