To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 3 07:24:34 +0000 2008 ------- I see two key comments in previous notes here. "why [do] we need a row limit at all?" and "The concern for increased sheet size is always with the performance." But I assume that even with the current hard limits, Calc will keep track of the highest row/col/sheet used (if it doesn't, it should). In which case a permitted unlimited size becomes a non-issue, at least as regards performance because Calc should only be calculating for non-empty cells. Then if a user needs a large spreadsheet and is prepared to put up with correspondingly slow performance, that should be his choice; better that than making some large tasks totally impossible for some users. Fixed limits is usually a result of hard-coded static arrays. Surely we have better techniques these days? There's a lot to be said for the old 0, 1, infinity rule! --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
