To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91602


User er changed the following:

                What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
                      CC|''                        |'er,sb'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Ever confirmed|                          |1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Status|UNCONFIRMED               |NEW
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Issue type|DEFECT                    |PATCH
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Target milestone|---                       |OOo 3.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 17 13:13:46 +0000 
2008 -------
I think this should go into ::rtl::math where a wrapper would call either the
compiler provided function or the replacement. Stephan, what do you think?

Btw, is there a way to detect at compilation time whether a compiler supports
these functions, other than using #ifdef __MSC_VER or similar respectively the
usual configure attempt to test compile a function call?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to