To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91957
                 Issue #|91957
                 Summary|GCF - grammar checking and fields
               Component|Word processor
                 Version|DEV300m26
                Platform|All
                     URL|
              OS/Version|All
                  Status|NEW
       Status whiteboard|
                Keywords|
              Resolution|
              Issue type|TASK
                Priority|P3
            Subcomponent|code
             Assigned to|mru
             Reported by|tl





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 22 09:09:33 +0000 
2008 -------
Grammar checking should resolve the content of fields within the text in order
to have their content checked as part of the text.

Open questions:
- should the text content of all fields be resolved? (probably yes)
- we need to take care of fields that can not be edited once the content is
  reported as incorrect. (probably not reporting the error at all)
- editable fields with no special meaning (like database fileds etc.) need 
  to be changed when suggested text gets applied for incorrect content.
- the 0x01 and 0x02 characters that currently get returned for the text from
  the XFlatParagraph interface should probably not be part of the text in
  case of grammar checking since they are not really part of the sentence.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to