To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92627
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 11 20:16:28 +0000 2008 ------- Just found 300dev_m1 on the ftp server. You were correct, m1 is somehow newer than m29. Now the question should be why? If it's a continuation of the 300dev snapshot sequence, it should be m30. And the latest snapshot on the website is still m29, hence the confusion. I'll leave this as unconfirmed, at least until someone can explain the use of an "older" name. JBV^_^ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
