To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92577
User fme changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Target milestone|OOo 3.1 |OOo 3.x
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 12 07:37:44 +0000
2008 -------
fme->tora: Thank you for your detailed analysis of this issue. While I agree
that having a third list would be the perfect solution, I'm tempted to ask
whether we can't start with a hard-coded list? Looks like this list is
hard-coded in Word as well. Currently the LineBreakUserOptions which are passed
to the break iterator cannot hold a third list. So introducing a third list
means:
1. Changing the UI
2. Changing the API
3. Changing settings.xml in the ODF files
Looks like a lot of work for this not-too-much-requested issue. Another point I
like to address is this: Changing the line break algorithm means that existing
documents might change their layout. Can we cope with this or should we
introduce some kind of (hidden) compatibility option so that only new documents
make use of the changed line break behavior?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
