To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92949
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 20 14:16:12 +0000
2008 -------
@cmc: my previous comment above was about the second part of your patch, the
first part is fine as it is.
Speaking of the second part again: Just removing the semicolon would work of
course. Since this bug was
real and the intent was easily misunderstood it should be probably rewritten
like this:
for( int nCount = 0; (it != maFontSubstList.end()) && (nCount++ != nIndex);
++it ) ;
if( it == maFontSubstList.end() )
return false;
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
