To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30172
User er changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'pagalmes,rpolach' |'lvyue,pagalmes,rpolach'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Calc's INDIRECT function a|ODFF: INDIRECT function ad
|dditionally should interpr|ditionally should interpre
|et the exclamation mark as|t the exclamation mark as
| sheet-cell separator. |sheet-cell separator.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subcomponent|editing |programming
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target milestone|OOo Later |OOo 3.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 25 11:37:43 +0000
2008 -------
@lvyue: I'd try to use a ScAddress::Convention of ScAddress::CONV_XL_A1 if the
attempts to parse with ScAddress::CONV_OOO failed. This could be done nicely in
a loop, I guess. Note that the ScAddress::CONV_XL_R1C1 case (2nd parameter not
present or not True) should not be touched by this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
