To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92985
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 4 15:51:40 +0000 2008 ------- AW->pjanik: No, they are using a GCC 3.4.1 and each compiler change is a lot of work. If a 4.2.3 would be used, i would have never been able to add those new warnings. Seems as if predeclarations of implementation classes in headers in anonymous namespaces is tolerated by all other compilers, but not with gcc 4.2.3. I have no good workaround and no way to get the warming list currently... :-( --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
