To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40827
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 6 07:38:48 +0000 2008 ------- I wasn't aware of the macro possibility. It's so slow that I actually didn't try to look around for advanced features. -> os : Thanks for your comment. Since it's the common case, what do you think of : 1) detect if macros are planned 2) use one of the two methods according to the previous test ? According to comments on this issue, it seems that the first way to have faster mail merge is to make it with macro, without the wizard. For EmbedAllLinks() & others unidentified method objects, I am wondering if it has any effects at all on the merged document. They are applied before the merge and it seems that the result will be the same for each documents. Any field mapping/editing method should be undo-able, isn't it ? Is this not the case ? If not, does the problem lies really on the patch & on this issue ? BTW, as mfn said : "I don't think that it's a real solution for the actual problem, that it's not possible to clone documents in the memory, but it's a temporary solution that is imho totally needed." -> os : Whatever the answers are about the two previous question, what do you think about a switch (checkbox) in the wizard ? One which activates/disables this trick. Regards, --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
