To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=94637
User grahamperrin changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|CLOSED |UNCONFIRMED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 8 21:48:49 +0000
2008 -------
With apologies for re-opening: I'm uneasy about closure of an issue that
demonstrated loss of data.
True: the situation in which loss was demonstrated may be peculiar.
However: in any situation, a loss occurring with no error, warning or
explanation to the user 'feels
wrong'.
If
> the lock is recognized only by OOo3.0
then, how could two users of OO0300m8 open and edit the same file resulting in
loss of one user's
data?
(Did a fix for the issue follow milestone 8?)
I can't pretend to fully understand the technical aspects, I do appreciate more
generally a 'lesser of two
evils' approach, but something feels not quite right about this one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
