To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5991
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 9 21:55:52 +0000 2008 ------- Mathias, thanks for offering to help. As far as I am concerned, the work is basically done, and just needs to get pushed through the approval process. My patches are in the CWS 'overline3' and Frank M. has promised to review them. I expect we will need to create a fresh CWS to get back in sync with the development head - past experience suggests that automatically resyncing the CWS will result in a big mess (that is why we are already at 'overline3' :-( ). But I would rather not go through that again until we are close to integration. Also, there is some renaming I would like to do, to reflect the fact that the FontUnderline enumeration is now used for both underline and overline attributes. There is an open issue in the specification relating to this. I would like to hear other opinions on this, as it affects both the UNO API and the internal code. Again though, I would prefer not to do this work until we are close to integration, as it will change lots of lines of code - making resyncing even more painful. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
