To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96265





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 17 21:54:49 +0000 
2008 -------
I think you may have misunderstood my report. (Spacebar is *never* "accept" in
normal use). Normally, one uses ENTER to accept a completion, while to reject a
completion, one simply continues to type, so the space-bar will always function
as "reject".


You seem to think that I'm suggesting that:
    Spacebar should normally be accept, but in some corner case, it should
    be reject.

Actually, what I'm saying is that:
    When one rejects a completion [by using spacebar], if the character ahead
    of the cursor also happens to be a space, then the User's action should
    be interpreted as just "reject the completion", instead of the usual 
    "reject the completion, and insert a space-character".


In the case I outlined, the user ends up with a doubled space, which is
unintentional. It's also hard to spot the mistake. 

Pressing right-arrow isn't helpful: it means the user has to know about the bug,
devote mental attention to it, and work around it in an inconvenient way: it
would be more useful to suggest pressing SPACE,DEL.

[A similar example of "breaking the algorithm to be more consistent with what
users expect" is given by the behaviour of Ctrl-T in readline, when the
cursor-position is on the last character of the line.]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to