To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91226
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 1 12:03:30 +0000 2008 ------- Note: I made this issue depend on issue 88665, as that is about adding the ISO mapping and language list box entries. Further discussion about the script type problematics should be carried over there to not clutter this issue here. @erdee: Forget about the "language type" (Western, CTL, CJK), that is only some arbitrarily (and IMHO badly) constructed classification introduced by MS, in fact it should be called "CTL, CJK, Other" instead. The problem is with the script types, and that currently multiple script types for one language are not representable in the API, and storing them in the file format is also not implemented yet. To your points above: 1. No, there are no user definable language codes reserved in ISO 639. 2. A branch of OOo: you don't really want that. You especially don't want it to maintain. If you personally want to do that, including rebasing the branch to new master milestones to catch up with development on trunk, do the release handling, QA and everything else that is needed, then of course it would be a possibility. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
