To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91547
User er changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |FIXED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target milestone|OOo 3.x |OOo 3.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 4 23:36:10 +0000
2008 -------
In cws odff05:
revision 264879
sc/source/core/inc/interpre.hxx
sc/source/core/tool/interpr3.cxx
sc/source/ui/src/scfuncs.src
This yields indeed a _much_ better precision than before.
I noticed that for unxlngi6 non-pro in the test case documents the
calculated values slightly differ from the ones copied to the "OOo"
column. This may be due to different compilers, optimizations et al.
Interestingly in most cases the calculated values were a little bit
closer to the MuPad values than the copied values, but only in the
second-last displayed digit or so. I'll recheck in a product build.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
