To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97411
                 Issue #|97411
                 Summary|Digital signatures show as invalid in x86_64 build
               Component|framework
                 Version|OOO300m9
                Platform|Opteron/x86_64
                     URL|
              OS/Version|Linux
                  Status|UNCONFIRMED
       Status whiteboard|
                Keywords|
              Resolution|
              Issue type|DEFECT
                Priority|P3
            Subcomponent|code
             Assigned to|tm
             Reported by|adaviel





------- Additional comments from [email protected] Thu Dec 18 23:50:45 
+0000 2008 -------
If I have a valid certificate root and certificate in Mozilla, they show as "OK"
in the "View Certificate" panel. But in the "Digital Signatures" panel they show
with the yellow triangle "the signatures in this document are invalid", and I
cannot add a new one. This occurs with at least two different certificates.
This problem is with the X86-64 install from
OOo_3.0.0_LinuxX86-64_install_en-US.tar.gz, and also with the 2.3.0 build
distributed with RHEL5 (openoffice.org-writer-2.3.0-6.5.4.el5_2.x86_64)

If I use the i586 build on the same platform, using the same
MOZILLA_CERTIFICATE_FOLDER, I can add signatures and view them without error. I
can also view them correctly under Windows Vista.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to