To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96474
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Thu Jan 22 15:42:11 +0000 2009 ------- AW: Indeed, AAis better. Checked the flag for fallback to VCL rendering, this is available. Started to compare. Wavelines: There is no way to really make these the same as in VCL since VCL kind of 'fakes' them by simple, resolution-dependent (i think three rough steps) line painting. The decomposition is more precise and will e.g. use a line width for the waveline where VCL falls back to hairline (probably historically due to speed concerns). This makes setting the wavelength (which is always the same in VCL in each rough step) impossible. Anyways, i optimized the wave's height and use a 2.0times relative wavelength to get a smooth wave. Also adapted the wave dustance for double wave, this was really wrong. Adapted the double line distance a little bit, too. This is all to correct the decomposition of the TextDecoratedPortionPrimitive2D. Each renderer may handle it directly and add some kind of hinting here. For 3.1 i will use the VCL fallback for pixel devices (VDev and Window), so we will use the VCL-FontRendering Hinting, but have a good graphic quality for higher-res devices. Testing to do that... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
