To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58313
User fs changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |INVALID
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Tue Jan 27 08:39:59 +0000
2009 -------
Let me cite from a recent conversation with an IBM engineer:
> I fixed the bug you found in "supportsResultSetConcurrency", then the query
> works fine.
> I only checked "supportsResultSetType" before, that is correct.
> I attached the new unijdbc.jar, if you like, you can put in Herve's VM
> environment to test it.
In fact, the fixed unijdbc.jar solved the problem. So, it's confirmed by now
that this is a bug in IBM's JDBC driver.
I resolve this as INVALID then, since it's not an OpenOffice.org issue. Please
contact IBM for a new version of the JDBC driver.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
