To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99899
User is changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|NEW |STARTED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Thu Mar 5 09:38:20 +0000
2009 -------
You used the variable
"packageversion"
that is used as version for RPMs, Solaris packages, ...
This can only contain the format:
"major.minor.micro".
So the OOo 310 m4 contains a package with the correct name:
openoffice.org3-writer2latex-0.5.2-9388.i586.rpm
"0.5.2" is the version of the package, not of the oxt file (that of course is
not influenced by the usage of "packageversion").
By the way: All other packages have the packageversion "3.1.0".
If you do not like "0.5.2" I would suggest to use the "3.1.0".
Additionally I changed the name to "openoffice.org3-writer2latex" instead of
"ooobasis3.1-writer2latex" because the package content is written into the brand
layer instead of the basis layer.
So I would fix this by introducing the automatically generated packageversion
"3.1.0". How do you think about this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
