To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99972





------- Additional comments from [email protected] Fri Mar  6 18:10:00 
+0000 2009 -------
Hi the Kichwa academy is located in Ambato, province of Chimborazo. 
http://www.dineib.edu.ec/kamak.htm

However, Shukllachishka Kichwa (unified Kichwa) is a new ortography for all the
Quichua dialects in Ecuador. There are plans for making Kichwa an official
language, and a unified orthography is needed.

So I wrote to SIL.org to open a new language identifier for the Unified Kichwa,
but the answer was no: http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/criteria2.html says
quite clearly that new orthographies are not given new codes. 

In total, since 
1) it seemed incorrect to assign the unified Kichwa to only one of the dialects 
and
2) Kichwa is [probably] becoming an official language for Ecuador,

I assumed qu_EC would be the most accurate description. qu for "a Quechua
dialect", EC for Ecuador.

If we have to choose one specific dialect, I assume "qxl" would be closest due
to the fact that it is the dialect spoken around Ambato, where the Kichwa
academy is located. However, as stated above, the unified Kichwa is not pure
Salasaca Quichua, but a unification.

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambato compared to
http://www.ethnologue.com/show_country.asp?name=EC and
http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=que


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to