To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90219
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Wed Mar 18 07:40:34 +0000 2009 ------- Okay, you are right in that the service description can be read this way. (I won't pick nits about the difference between "if" and "if and only if" here :) However, you did not respond to the second item, which in fact is my bigger concern: The change you did breaks (semantic) API compatibility. While that is sometimes legitimate, it should have a really good justification, which I don't see here. Defaulting to the file-open template shouldn't pose any problem, right? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
