To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99915
User iha changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'thb,weiz' |'aw,thb,weiz'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Fri Apr 3 13:31:37 +0000
2009 -------
@aw, thb, adding an additional parameter to several methods at the matrix
classes seems quite unhandy to me. What an ugly interface to use (and
implement). Wouldn't it make more sense to add the precision limit as a member
to the matrix class?
Furthermore the current precision limit:
double ::basegfx::fTools::mfSmallValue = 0.000000000001;
seems to me to be optimized for graphical display purposes where operations
might mostly happen in orders of magnitude of typical pixel counts or cm. That's
quite ok if one looks at the namspace of this matrix classes.
So maybe the use of the basegfx matrices for more general mathematical
calculations is not the right choice. Can one of you suggest another matrix
class? Or have the basegfx matrix classes the claim to be all purpose matrices?
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on your classes with the users of your
classes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
