To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=100851
User aw changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'andreschnabel,hdu,lendo,m|'andreschnabel,aw,hdu,lend
|h,pmike,rbircher,regina' |o,mh,pmike,rbircher,regina
| |,thb'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Wed Apr 8 10:26:20 +0000
2009 -------
AW: I experimented with a native OOO310 m9 and AA on Linux in general. My basic
idea was to not use AAed filled PolyPolygon rendering at all, but to paint
non-AAed filled PolyPolygons and their outline as AA-ed hairline.
This works qualitatively well, but is surprisingly not really faster (!). Only
when leaving out paining the AA-ed hairline outlines i get to speed.
This leaves only one result: Painting ANYTHING AA-ed (filled PolyPolygons or
hairlines) on Linux systems using XRender extension is generally one magnitude
slower than non-AAed. It looks like it's not HW_accelerated, but using a
Software-renderer.
So, the question is: What is the most reliable way on Linux to paint AA-ed
geometry to an offscreen raster with HW-Acceleration? I can't believe that
XRender extensions are not using HW-acceleration nowadays...?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
