To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101356
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Tue Apr 28 08:13:51 +0000 2009 ------- I have only now understood the reason for the confusion, I have referred the singleton as a service in my first message. Sorry for the typo. If it was a service, it had of course no sense to introduce the usage limitation for such a general implementation. But, the singleton can have only one instance. That means that the only reasonable way to set the ring size, is to do it in the implementation. If we need another ring-singleton next time, we can do it based on the current implementation by registering it with a different singleton name ( and adjusting the implementation if necessary ). --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
