To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18004
User mba changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Priority|P5 |P3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Fri Jun 12 09:34:38 +0000
2009 -------
I think the priority has no meaning at all - the number of duplicates makes this
an important requirement. That's the reason why it has target "3.x". That gives
it a much higher probability of getting implemented than an issues with Prio 3
but target "OOoLater".
But to avoid confusions I agree that Prio 3 is better.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sw.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sw.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
