To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106032
User tl changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'dwayne' |'dwayne,nemeth,sba'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Mon Oct 19 11:55:11 +0000
2009 -------
tl->cmc: I'm a bit worried about people actually changing the content of the
human readable version, because the code that was provided as patch is quite
sensitive to white space and line ends. And changing them by accident will not
work with the provided code.
It was ok as long this was only used by the patch provider or some automated
tooling. But if we are to allow for user editable dictionary content the code
should be more stable in respect to changing white space and line ends.
The other reason is, that in the longer run it would still be much nicer if the
dictionary format would be the same as in hunspell dictionaries.
Problems here:
- hunpsell does not allow to provide hyphenation points in spell check
dictionaries, thus we would need an extra file for those.
- and hunspell has no support for exception dictionaries
For all of the above we are still stuck with the binary format.
tl->nemeth: any comments from your side.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
