To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69088
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Fri Nov 20 09:42:50 +0000 2009 ------- tl->eugene_b: I agree that according to http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/chapter4.html#contm.semantics a annotation tag should not be required and therefore or ODF validator might have a slight problem here. (I have forwarded a note about this to someone else.) However, since despite that the corrected MathML can still be imported lets drop this particular item. (My attached sample doc also does not have that tag.) And no, w3.org not listing a "StarMath 5.0" annotation is not a problem at all. w3.org is just listing some examples for known existing tags. But that does not mean there is predefined and fixed set from that annotations must be chosen. But I'm still curious about the effect of your fix, did it solve the problem? If yes it would seem we have a patch. If that is the case please add it to this issue, change the type to 'PATCH' and assign the issue to me. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
