To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107319
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Tue Dec 1 16:09:39 +0000 2009 ------- AW->sos: I see nothing what keeps You from producing your charts in "a professional printing-postscript envoriment where Tranparencies are forbidden". This is exactly what the 'automatic mix' of transparent objects in the PDF export does. It just warns You in case something happened what reduced Your quality. This is not the case here as long as there is no graphic (e.g. text) 'behind' the chart which would be rendered as bitmap information. This does not reduce the quality since with non-transparent charts nothing 'behind' the charts could be visible anyways (also no page color, so our solution is even better when looking at th example document). The difference to our big competitor is that they use only 'fake' 3D, not real 3D like us. The advantage is that they have (many, many, but only) 2D objects. The disadvantage is that it's no real 3D, so they get no real 3D lighting (only one light possible, lighting 'faked' by gradients) and cannot have 3D objects which interpenetrate themselves (not used in charts, but in 3D scenes). All in all the warning is correct (there is a 3D object), but the solution produced in the PDF is correct, too. HTH! --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
