To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107489
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Wed Dec 9 13:57:27 +0000 2009 ------- as far as I know we have the following builds normal , dev , archive , langpack , deb , rpm , pkg , dmg , download , non_download , sdk , openoffice , broffice , plattforms so please add this info into the naming scheme, ingo should know all the details. Another pitfall right now: - mac dmg installsets are one image file but not in the download folder ( ok , this can be discussed if this right or not ) So why not name them <product>-<plattform>-<installtype>-<packagetype>-<format>-<langs> product := OOo , BrOffice plattform := SolarisSparc , LinuxIntel .... installtype := full , langpack packagetype := normal , dev , archive format := rpm , deb , pkg , none langs := de , fr , de_fr_en-US ..... e.g. OOo_3.2-LinuxIntel-languagepack-dev-deb-de BrOffice_3.2.1-SolarisSparc-full-archive-none-pt-BR OOo_3.2-MacOSXIntel-full-normal-dmg-en-US_fr_de but Ingo might have a better overview about this matrix --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
