To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107490
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Fri Jan 15 12:06:47 +0000 2010 ------- I applied the patch to the OOG680_m5 we're using, and it helped to reduce the number of crashes. However, I now see a similar crash: ==30720== Thread 6: ==30720== Invalid read of size 4 ==30720== at 0x39D8A08293: pthread_mutex_lock (in /lib64/libpthread-2.5.so) ==30720== by 0x7210593: osl_acquireMutex (mutex.c:144) ==30720== by 0x720AB9B: osl::Mutex::acquire() (mutex.hxx:74) ==30720== by 0x720ABF2: osl::Guard<osl::Mutex>::Guard(osl::Mutex*) (mutex.hxx:153) ==30720== by 0x7245AFB: rtl_moduleCount_release (unload.cxx:160) ==30720== by 0xE6C69A9: bridges::cpp_uno::shared::Bridge::~Bridge() (bridge.cxx:231) ==30720== by 0xE6C6B85: bridges::cpp_uno::shared::freeMapping(_uno_Mapping*) (bridge.cxx:60) ==30720== by 0x6FC3E5A: uno_revokeMapping (lbmap.cxx:705) ==30720== by 0xE6C69F8: bridges::cpp_uno::shared::Bridge::release() (bridge.cxx:197) ==30720== by 0xE6C8ED9: bridges::cpp_uno::shared::freeUnoInterfaceProxy(_uno_ExtEnvironment*, void*) (unointerfaceproxy.cxx:65) ==30720== by 0x6FC8154: s_stub_defenv_revokeInterface (lbenv.cxx:417) ==30720== by 0x6FCEC95: s_environment_invoke_v(_uno_Environment*, _uno_Environment*, void (*)(__va_list_tag (*) [1]), __va_list_tag (*) [1]) (EnvStack.cxx:300) ==30720== by 0x6FCED31: uno_Environment_invoke_v (EnvStack.cxx:319) ==30720== by 0x6FCEDCD: uno_Environment_invoke (EnvStack.cxx:328) ==30720== by 0x6FC6DDE: defenv_revokeInterface (lbenv.cxx:473) ==30720== by 0xE6C8D93: bridges::cpp_uno::shared::releaseProxy(_uno_Interface*) (unointerfaceproxy.cxx:104) ==30720== by 0x10C1EC60: bridges_remote::Uno2RemoteStub::~Uno2RemoteStub() (stub.cxx:336) ==30720== by 0x10C1F263: bridges_remote::freeUno2RemoteStub(_uno_ExtEnvironment*, void*) (stub.cxx:296) ==30720== by 0x6FC8154: s_stub_defenv_revokeInterface (lbenv.cxx:417) ==30720== by 0x6FCEC95: s_environment_invoke_v(_uno_Environment*, _uno_Environment*, void (*)(__va_list_tag (*) [1]), __va_list_tag (*) [1]) (EnvStack.cxx:300) ==30720== by 0x6FCED31: uno_Environment_invoke_v (EnvStack.cxx:319) ==30720== by 0x6FCEDCD: uno_Environment_invoke (EnvStack.cxx:328) ==30720== by 0x6FC6DDE: defenv_revokeInterface (lbenv.cxx:473) ==30720== by 0x10C1FFBF: thisRelease (stub.cxx:66) ==30720== by 0x10C0A5BB: bridges_urp::ServerMultiJob::execute() (urp_job.cxx:701) ==30720== by 0x10C0CAC0: doit (urp_job.cxx:77) ==30720== by 0x6FD323F: cppu_threadpool::JobQueue::enter(long, unsigned char) (jobqueue.cxx:126) ==30720== by 0x6FD3C53: cppu_threadpool::ORequestThread::run() (thread.cxx:199) ==30720== by 0x6FD3E9A: cppu_requestThreadWorker (thread.cxx:56) ==30720== by 0x72111FE: osl_thread_start_Impl (thread.c:279) ==30720== Address 0xab9a098 is 16 bytes inside a block of size 40 free'd ==30720== at 0x4A06B3E: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:323) ==30720== by 0x7210540: osl_destroyMutex (mutex.c:125) ==30720== by 0x720C16D: osl::Mutex::~Mutex() (mutex.hxx:65) ==30720== by 0x7244E71: __tcf_0 (unload.cxx:140) ==30720== by 0x39D7E33354: exit (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so) ==30720== by 0x39D7E1D97A: (below main) (in /lib64/libc-2.5.so) Can we do something similar here? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
