To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110023
                 Issue #|110023
                 Summary|Attribute based font matching fails sometimes
               Component|gsl
                 Version|OOO320m13
                Platform|All
                     URL|
              OS/Version|All
                  Status|NEW
       Status whiteboard|
                Keywords|
              Resolution|
              Issue type|DEFECT
                Priority|P3
            Subcomponent|code
             Assigned to|hdu
             Reported by|hdu





------- Additional comments from [email protected] Wed Mar 10 15:26:16 +0000 
2010 -------
For requests to completely unknown fonts there is a fallback to attribute based 
matching. This usually 
results in quite reasonable matches, especially if a document has additional 
font details and/or the 
requested font name provides some clues by having substrings such as "wide", 
"roman", "sans", "dings", 
etc.

A change introduced by issue 52301
http://gsl.openoffice.org/source/browse/gsl/vcl/source/gdi/outdev3.cxx?r1=1.201&r2=1.201.26.1
changed the way the available fonts were characterized and their attributes 
were not determined with the 
same reliability as before. The availability of these attributes is critical 
when matching them to the request  
and lack of reliability results in layout inconsistencies.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to