To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42967
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 24 08:59:56 -0700 2005 ------- Trying it in the latest snapshot confirms Arthit's guess: "restricted" means use WTT 2.0 strict checking rather than WTT 2.0 basic checking. The simplest improvement would be to replace "Restricted" by "Strict" and fix the help file. That's not ideal because I don't think we can expect users to be familiar with WTT 2.0, so a non-technical explanation of basic vs strict is needed. I would suggest something like this. Basic checking is enough to ensure that the characters in the document can all be displayed: it just checks that the sequence of characters in each cell is valid. Strict checking catches additional illegal input sequences spanning multiple cells, which involve leading or following vowels. Maybe a better question is: why offer the user a choice between basic and strict? I think 99% of the time a user would want strict checking. In the other 1% they can simply turn off input sequence checking. Word always does strict input sequence checking. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
