To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95045
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Wed May 19 05:19:45 +0000 2010 ------- this is a lose-lose situation here. everybody loses - the customer loses because the product doesn't work. I lose because my bug gets dissed for providing details about the original issue, which, if I am not mistaken, is "can't open Excel 2003 xml files in OOO, can't open OOO excel 2003 xml files in Excel". I get punished for providing details by breaking the original problem down into minutia. what kind of a deal is this? I am a programmer. most programmers want details as to what exactly is wrong. So I provided the details. I realize that was a big mistake. I am not sure I would want to deal with 20 bugs for one issue, but if that's the way you want it, so be it. please reopen the issue or tell me to create separate issues if you really feel that separate issues for such minutia warrants separate bugs. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
