To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112245
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Wed Jun 9 12:55:49 +0000 2010 ------- AW: This one will concentrate on finding a solution on rendering side, of course. There are already the basics (new basegfx stuff), but the old office (and definitions of the forefathers) is in the way (as often) :-( The long run plan is anyways to get rid of the tools polygon completely. It is a defect in the sense of the API, when the whole office (unfortunately containing many old parts) is seen as implementation. It's an enhancement when knowing that the office comes from never having been able to do such polygons and gets better step by step. At least it should not lead to define the UNO API as accepting only polygons with 65536 points, else throwing exceptions (which would have been a must when defining the API at the time it was defined :-)). --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
