To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20819
------- Additional comments from [email protected] Thu Sep 23 20:31:32 +0000 2010 ------- Actually, LINEST gives positive values for fitted values. It is then the best solution in this case. CorelPoly macro from Laurent Godard (see template attached to this issue) is more user friendly than LINEST but is useless in this case. However, with less severe values (decrease 2000 to all X values in my previous example), it works very well. The goal of the future extension is to gather the benefit of both workarounds. But I agree, it is only a workaround, not the solution of this issue. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
