To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49425
Issue #:|49425
Summary:|Named ranges in a spreadsheet: relative v/ absolute
|referencing
Component:|Spreadsheet
Version:|OOo 1.1.4
Platform:|All
URL:|
OS/Version:|All
Status:|UNCONFIRMED
Status whiteboard:|
Keywords:|
Resolution:|
Issue type:|FEATURE
Priority:|P3
Subcomponent:|code
Assigned to:|spreadsheet
Reported by:|ennio_sr
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 16:39:08 -0700
2005 -------
Hi!
Working with named ranges I found that they always operate as 'absolute'
reference; this may result somewhat confusing in a large spreadsheet as it makes
impossible to use named ranges in formulas: when copying cell formulas the
result would be different from what expected.
Wouldn't it be possible to change this feature in such a way as to make possible
to distinguish between 'absolute' and 'relative' reference to a named range?
Just by way of example, in Lotus Millennium I could choose between:
a. nrc_1
b. $nrc_1
Notation 'a' would be considered as a 'relative' address (so its value would
change for each row/col in which it was pasted) whereas notation 'b' would be
considered as 'absolute' (invariable).
Thanks for your attention.
Regards,
Ennio.
P.S. I found the same behaviour in OO-1.9.82
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
