To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49495
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 07:25:07 -0700 2005 ------- > But - surprise, surprise ;-) - for me it IS the point. But it doesn't have to be. With 2.0 we can fairly trivially ensure that older macros have the various options inserted in them and that they are compiled/run in the 'incompatible' ;-) mode - and we can transition to compatibility by default for anything 2.0+. At least - delaying that transition ( to defaulting to a compatible basic ) is only going to cause more problems longer term - surely ? That is my point - not that we should clobber the default by default, but that we should also do the <-> file-format work. Sure - I also patch the 'CompatibilityMode' flag too [ FWIW ;-] I didn't attach that part - clearly the same issue applies. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
