To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47679


User mba changed the following:

                  What    |Old value                 |New value
================================================================================
               Assigned to|tra                       |mav
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Status|STARTED                   |NEW
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 25 07:00:58 -0700 
2005 -------
Finally we got 'em:
If the wrapper of the COM object we keep as a copy in the clipboard document is
released it calls CoUninitialize (because it called CoInitialize when it was
created). Unfortunately creation and deletion happen in different threads,
creation in the "main" thread, deletion in the clipboard thread. So at the end
COM is shut down in the clipboard thread and prevents it from further work.

Removing the CoUninitialize call fixes the problem. This is acceptable as a
short time fix (in OOo1.1 we also didn't call this BTW). In the long run we must
solve the threading issue that BTW was also present in all OOo versions (what
can be taken as prove that deletion of the other object doesn't create a known
issue though it is theoretically incorrect).


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to