To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49425
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 25 16:27:51 -0700
2005 -------
Hi dr.
thanks for your answer.
I just came back home and found your message: as my original file is quite big
I'll try to take a reduced copy of it which reproduces correctly what I meant.
AAMOF the middle file was an Excel .xls (not .xml, sorry for the error).
I gave a quick look at this .xls (as I can see it from OOo-1.1.4) and noticed
that all my original 'named ranges' are shown as 'absolute' (i.e. $X,$Y). Now
I've got to see how they were defined in the original .123 file (but I have to
use Win$oz for that ;( ...). Will revert in due course.
Regards,
Ennio.
PS. Opened the original .123 file with OOo-1.9.82 but it did not show any of the
original defined ranges ...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
