To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49853
User ebischoff changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|CLOSED |UNCONFIRMED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|INVALID |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 27 02:20:00 -0700
2005 -------
OK, but then what's the point in keeping the old 1.0 DTD
in the 2.0 source tree?
Or shouldn't at least a clear comment
<!-- This is the DTD for OOo version 1.x file format.
For 2.0 file format, please refer to Relax-NG schema at
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office
-->
be added at the top of "office.dtd" and all ".mod" files?
Or shouldn't two subdirectories 1.0/ and 2.0/ be created? There's also a
file openoffice-2.0-schema.rng lost in the middle of all these 1.0 files.
I find the current situation very confusing for any developper
interested in 2.0 file format.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
