To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49322
User dvo changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |FIXED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target milestone|--- |OOo 2.0.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 27 09:45:54 -0700
2005 -------
dvo: Good catch. Fixed in dvoqbfix4.
The class in question is a re-implementation of another class of unknown
provenience, which would probably not allow re-distribution under OOo. Hence, I
simply copied the interface of that original class and replaced it with an
STL-based implementation. The set(..) method of the original class would return
0/1 (depending on the success of the operation). Since we don't make any use of
this return value in our code, there was no misbehaviour.
I changed the return type to void. That seems the cleanest thing, and it shoud
do away with the warning.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
