To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47752
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 30 02:08:08 -0700 2005 ------- Yes, having two different target encodings is a better idea than the compile time option. What would it look like though? RTL_TEXTENCODING_UCS2 and RTL_TEXTENCODING_UTF16 where RTL_TEXTENCODING_UCS2 is a synonym to RTL_TEXTENCODING_UNICODE? In this way other encodings than BIG5 could harvest the benefits of runtime surrogate/non-surrogate encoding too. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
