To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50660
User fs changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |INVALID
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 28 08:32:32 -0700
2005 -------
Hmm, how should a foreign key be created with *one* field in B referring to
*two* fields in table A?
By definition, one field in table a is not sufficient to uniquely identify a
record in A, you always need both fields - basically, this is what you say when
you make a compound primary key.
So, if you want to refer, from table B, to a particular record in table A, how
could this be possible when your reference only uses *one* field? That's
impossible, isn't it?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
