To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 5 15:03:40 -0700
2005 -------
Hi kr, hi cyb
<not mandatory> soffice as a UNIX program must have it. Each of them deliver
this command line info (some hacker and m$ don't use it)
You are right: 1.6.1 OR 1.9.m113 are the IDs of the _bundle_ soffice &
soofice is the 'front end'. This
IDs are used as IDs for distribution (look on a mirror for OOo) and to announce
a new release of the 'bundle' (a salesmen cannot sell without saying 'New
version xx'). Developers have for each part a own release-id.
And, please not a new invention: We need simply the id usable to get the new
release without manually editing the URL.
cyb's "brandmarked" is for my English a good apt quotation.
And, look on the response soffice -h: The first line tells 1.9.113,
inconsistent is the missing 1.4.1 (writes '645m52')
Sorry for the stress: I should reduce the output using:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r #not -a = all
2.6.11.10-ARCH
and your box says then 2.6.11-1 and 2.4.27 (hmm, is this a REF to my 'very
oldest UNIX/Linux boc'?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
