To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52074





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 22 22:38:57 -0700 
2005 -------
Hi, 

i do not want to blame anyone, but this problem probably comes from a 
defect in the tool that automatically produces static web pages from HTML 
source files held in the CVS system. 

It may be racing. (i am not sure how the tool works. This is my guess.)
The tool repeatedly checks out index.html with "cvs update" command. 
Meantime, the tool checks out the same file with the same command right 
after a user checks in index.html with "cvs commit" command through 
ssh ip tunnel. 

There might be a possibility that two "cvs update" commands 
concurrently run against the same file index.html. 

What would happen if racing occurs? One "cvs update" command will attempt 
to get a revision 1.1 of index.html but the file could be updated by 
another "cvs update" command that would get a revision 1.2 of index.html 
during the first "cvs update" command is processing.
In that case, the first one will result in the status of conflict and will 
insert marks of the conflict into the file index.html, which are considered 
to be solved by hand.

Japanese Native Language team has been waiting for prompt actions since 
last week because it happens in the top page of OpenOffice.org web site. 
Your help will be greatly appreciated. 

Best,
Tora


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to