On Wed 19 Aug 2015 10:12:43 AM Trent Gamblin wrote: > Ug, never reply to the list with gna...
I've just gotten into the habit of "reply to all" for other lists... > On 2015-08-19 10:11 AM, Trent Gamblin wrote: > > As long as it's verified to work, no harm in it. > > > > On 2015-08-19 12:36 AM, Jon Rafkind wrote: > >> Right now the android port won't build for the android x86_64 target > >> because pointers are passed around as int's. I think this can be > >> worked around by passing around 'jlong', which is guaranteed to be > >> 64-bits. > >> > >> The build will fail on x86_64 due to line 24 of android_input_stream.c > >> > >> ALLEGRO_STATIC_ASSERT(android, sizeof(int) == sizeof(ALLEGRO_FILE *)); > >> > >> The AllegroInputStream class currently accepts uses 'int' for the > >> handle, but could be changed to use 'long' (which corresponds to > >> jlong in the jni code). In this way, both 32-bit and 64-bit pointers > >> will be able to be stored in a handle. > >> > >> I can send a patch and/or just commit it if this sounds fine. > > _______________________________________________ > Allegro-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/allegro-developers -- Thomas Fjellstrom [email protected] _______________________________________________ Allegro-developers mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/allegro-developers
