Aren't there some features of Github that work better (or more smoothly at least) if the main branch is called 'master'?
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 at 22:15 SiegeLord <[email protected]> wrote: > So once 5.2 is released, it won't make sense to develop on the 5.1 > branch anymore. Since we'll have to make a new branch anyway, any > opinions on what to call it? The two logical options are: > > 5.2 - this would just follow the usual pattern. As per the unstable API > proposal, there won't be a 5.3 branch to go with it. > > master - this is somewhat more typical of git projects > > I don't care either way, but since we have this opportunity, I figured > I'd ask. > > -SL > > _______________________________________________ > Allegro-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/allegro-developers >
_______________________________________________ Allegro-developers mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/allegro-developers
