CJ, actually belay that. I need to sort out what tags to apply as the process has changed under AJOSP vs. ASA. Please don’t apply the tags.
From: Lioy, Marcello Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 3:49 PM To: 'Arvind Padole' <[email protected]>; Hertel, Carrie Lynn <[email protected]>; Josh Spain <[email protected]>; 'C.J. Collier' <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: 16.10 is Ready! Thanks everyone! This is a significant milestone as we have gotten Security 2.0 out the door! It has been a long time comeing. Congratulations to the team! CJ. Please apply the release tag to the RC1 commits. From: Arvind Padole [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 3:32 PM To: Hertel, Carrie Lynn <[email protected]>; Josh Spain <[email protected]>; Lioy, Marcello <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: 16.10 is Ready! I too confirm that development is complete and there are no commits in the pipeline. Congratulations everyone who contributed to this release. I think, this release by far is the highest quality release of AllJoyn core! Thanks, Arvind From: Hertel, Carrie Lynn [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 3:08 PM To: Josh Spain <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Marcello Lioy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Arvind Padole <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: 16.10 is Ready! QA is complete. ☺ Carrie Hertel, PMP Software Dev Group & Test Lab Director Center for Applied Systems & Software Oregon State University From: Josh Spain [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 3:08 PM To: Marcello Lioy <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Hertel, Carrie Lynn <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Arvind Padole <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: 16.10 is Ready! I see one under review from Paul on the RB16.10 branch, but it is slated for the 16.10a release. Therefore, I confirm the commits are correct and there are no further commits in the pipeline. -Josh On Nov 23, 2016 4:55 PM, "Lioy, Marcello" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Arvind, Josh and Carrie, All of the changes are merged for the 16.10 release, and release candidate builds have been generated. Please confirm: • Everyone: that the v16.10 tag should be placed on the commits identified below • Arvind and Josh: that development is complete and no further commits are in the pipeline. • Carrie: That QA is complete The commit IDs proposed for the v16.10 tag are: alljoyn.git: https://cgit.allseenalliance.org/core/alljoyn.git/commit/?h=RB16.10&id=0cd2ceff303a73f780f14bf012b10ecfe6bc2179 (tagged with : v16.10-rc1<https://cgit.allseenalliance.org/core/alljoyn.git/tag/?h=v16.10-rc1>) ajtcl.git: https://cgit.allseenalliance.org/core/ajtcl.git/commit/?h=RB16.10&id=4ad1cf982012427701991d3e726b4dcc8a852e92 (tagged with: v16.10-rc1<https://cgit.allseenalliance.org/core/ajtcl.git/tag/?h=v16.10-rc1>)
_______________________________________________ Alljoyn-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.alljoyn.org/mailman/listinfo/alljoyn-core
