I also confirm that both commits are correct for v16.10.02 tag. Regards, Krystian
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Karol Matuszkiewicz < kmatuszkiew...@affinegy.com> wrote: > I confirm that the v16.10.02 tag should be placed on the commits > identified in the email from Josh. > > Regards, > Karol > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Josh Spain <jsp...@affinegy.com> wrote: > >> AllJoyn Core 16.10.02 Team: >> >> All of the changes are merged for the 16.10.02 release, and release >> candidate builds have been generated. I confirm that development is >> complete and no further commits are in the pipeline. >> >> Team, please confirm the following by replying to all: >> >> - *Committers*: that the v16.10.02 tag should be placed on the >> commits identified below >> - *Carrie*: that QA is complete >> >> The commit IDs proposed for the v16.10.02 tag are: >> >> *alljoyn.git:* https://cgit.allseenalliance.org/core/alljoyn.git/commit/? >> id=43cce3fbb24b5cacc54d4cb2b823cab1c7bb41df >> (tagged with: v16.10.02-rc1) >> >> *ajtcl.git:* https://cgit.allseenalliance.org/core/ajtcl.git/ >> commit/?h=refs/heads/RB16.10&id=579f77a0518a1bb3c6461f367de7a9b24c882f14 >> (tagged with: v16.10.02-rc1) >> >> -Josh >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Alljoyn-core mailing list Alljoyn-core@lists.alljoyn.org https://lists.alljoyn.org/mailman/listinfo/alljoyn-core
