Thanks Dominique,

I would like just to add that the issue is also on "Config" meta-data (not 
only About) 
It is Config maintained by Core WG, isn't it?

Bye

/S

________________________________________

STEFANO TOPPAN

GTC (Global Technology Center)

ELECTROLUX ITALIA S.p.A.
Corso Lino Zanussi, 30 - 33080 Porcia (PN) - Italy
 
Tel: +39 0434 394901
Direct: +39 0434 394956
Fax: +39 0434 394915
E-mail: [email protected]
Web site: www.electrolux.com





From:   "Dominique Chanet (QEO LLC)" <[email protected]>
To:     Stefano Toppan <[email protected]>, 
"[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>, 
"[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>, 
Date:   16-02-16 12:44 PM
Subject:        Re: [Allseen-irb]  Custom Metadata Fields



About is maintained by the Core WG, so this question should really be 
directed to them. I’ve put the core mailing list in the loop.
I think your assessment is correct, though: adding custom metadata fields 
is OK. And yes, we need a convention to avoid naming conflicts. HAE has 
set precedent here, and it is good precedent, so we should codify that as 
a general rule.

So I think the main takeaway from this question is that the documentation 
for About should be adapted (potentially along with the certification 
tests) to turn the namespacing of custom About metadata fields into at 
least a recommended best practice and potentially a hard rule.

-Dominique

From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Stefano 
Toppan
Date: Tuesday 16 February 2016 at 11:05
To: "[email protected]"
Subject: [Allseen-irb] Custom Metadata Fields

Dear Dominique and IRB members, 

when HAE project was defining its own interfaces, you suggested to 
exchange some devices info at discovery phase adding some "custom" 
meta-data fields in the About and Config.
You can see in the "HAE Theory of Operation" (
https://git.allseenalliance.org/gerrit/#/c/5119/5/interfaces/org.alljoyn.SmartSpaces/theory-of-operation-v1.md
 
at paragraph "Service Framework's Custom Metadata Fields"); 
they are recognizable because of the common name-space 
"org.alljoyn.SmartSpaces".

My question is: 
is it allowed to add other custom meta-data for "vendor specific" 
application?
I mean, is it possible in a specific application to add a new meta-data 
field to those in the         About data interface? (e.g. somethink like 
"MyOwnField" with its own type)

I looked up in AllSeen site and there is no mention about it (anyway there 
is not even mention about adding meta-data for standard services like HAE 
did);
In addition I had a quick check on the certification tests of the About 
feature and it seems that a custom meta-data is not invalidating them.
So in principle I think it is possible to add proprietary meta-data.

Anyway could you please clarify the doubt? Thanks.

Moreover if custom meta-data are allowed I think it is the case to add 
some rules to their name to avoid future overlapping; e.g. using a 
name-space conventions like in HAE.
On the other hand (i.e. if you decide that they are not possible) I think 
it should be specified better in your guidelines.

Thanks 

Stefano 
________________________________________ 

STEFANO TOPPAN 

GTC (Global Technology Center) 

ELECTROLUX ITALIA S.p.A. 
Corso Lino Zanussi, 30 - 33080 Porcia (PN) - Italy
  
Tel: +39 0434 394901 
Direct: +39 0434 394956 
Fax: +39 0434 394915 
E-mail: [email protected]
Web site: www.electrolux.com



This email and any attached files is for the attention of the intended 
recipient. The email and any attachments may contain material that is 
confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product. If you are not the 
intended recipient:
(a) contact the sender immediately and delete from your system all copies 
of the email including any attachments.
(b) do not read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any 
part of it. Any such unauthorized use may be unlawful.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late 
or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore can not accept 
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, 
which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is 
required please request a hard-copy version. The Electrolux Group 
www.electrolux.com


This email and any attached files is for the attention of the intended 
recipient. The email and any attachments may contain material that is 
confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product. If you are not the 
intended recipient:
(a) contact the sender immediately and delete from your system all copies 
of the email including any attachments.
(b) do not read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any 
part of it. Any such unauthorized use may be unlawful.
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as 
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late 
or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore can not accept 
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, 
which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is 
required please request a hard-copy version. The Electrolux Group 
www.electrolux.com

_______________________________________________
Allseen-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.allseenalliance.org/mailman/listinfo/allseen-core

Reply via email to